🔗 Share this article

The new book centers on characters pursuing new beginnings, attempting to leave behind substance abuse or abusive marriages, only to find hope curdling into aggression. The author frequently uses the phrase "clean slate", transforming it into willfully cynical through recurring use. Sentences like "He could make a fresh start" and "They opted for a clean break" are scattered across the text. Meanwhile, the author herself appears to be undertaking her personal new beginning, since this appears a different type of work – fact-based, genuinely novelistic. Yet it proves to be laden with the recurring issues and aesthetics as her previous works.

From Accidental Writer to Renowned Book

Chris Kraus began as an visual artist who entered the literary world somewhat by chance with her 1997 groundbreaking book I Love Dick, structured as missives to a distant beloved, converting confessional female writing from humiliation into defiance. She persisted as a writer, but the next trio of fascinating and rebarbative novels lacked the impact and rawness that the correspondence format brought to the voice of I Love Dick. Compounding this was her identity as a maverick maker who had become a major property owner, so there was much discussion on housing investments. It makes sense that she currently desires to explore different types of content, looking outwards to the experiences of others, at a period in which she claims that contemporary political climate turns intimate literature redundant.

Three Generations, Collective Unavoidable Background

The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, encompassing three generations – none able to break free from their pasts. We encounter the tale of characters Emma and Jasper, representations of her own mother and father, relocating from the Bronx to rural Connecticut. There is the narrative of the author, in the persona of Catt Greene, confronting the delayed acclaim of I Love Dick, the emergence of Trump, and her partner struggling with addiction a man named Paul. And there is the account of a killing of one troubled youth by another in a town mostly forsaken by forward-thinking policies only 80 miles from Catt's rural residence in rural Minnesota.

As a reader fond of refined literature of the sort Kraus herself typically rejects, I was enchanted by the novelistic voice of the initial segment.

As a reader who favors crafted language of the style that Kraus herself usually avoids, I was seduced by the storytelling approach of the first section. There is a new quality of attentiveness that allows space for trivial aspects, like the container that the young Catt dislodges from ice at the opening of the book, aided by her beloved father. "Look, an ice toy!" she exclaims; "a great plaything", he answers, "the ambiguous meanings of language tumbling in their mouths like hard candy". Kraus writes Emma's story with curiosity and intimacy. "Emma experienced a dreamlike sensation – not hers, exactly."

Letdown and Fragmentation

I was fated to feel let down when I expected this new voice could continue through the novel. Kraus notes here that she is annoyed by the enjoyment those who appreciate polished prose have gotten from I Love Dick; she's dedicated to fragmentation, to the messy artistic approach she echoes from her hero author Kathy Acker, and the void and recurrence of her earlier works returns in the central part. Catt is working on refurbishing three dozen dilapidated units in the city's most challenging districts while moving between Minnesota and LA, unsuccessful in assisting her husband manage his alcohol use. She experiences powerlessness as her spouse transitions between low-resource employment as an recovery specialist in a environment propelled by the hostility and dread that drives an electoral success. A significant portion discusses about Catt being cancelled on a platform, her professional designation altered from "author" to "real estate holder" on the online encyclopedia. The author still appears to be overly concerned about this. In a moment she remarks that she's looking into the killing so that before exiting the region, "she could potentially understand something about an the United States that her online critics would not understand, would overlook entirely".

The Murder Narrative

Then we reach to the actual killing – and the referenced day spent by the deceased with the killer and his associates. Kraus utilizes compelling foundational content, and knows hour by hour what happened when Brandon came to see Brittney after meeting her on an app where she sold sex pictures. He anticipated intimacy but appears congenially to have passed the day alongside her friends, wandering about fixing his automobile and covering the cost of food and substances, before being killed by gunfire by Brittney's partner a man named Micah – a young, mentally ill man who has often been institutionalized for aggressive outbursts.

Fascination and Incompletion

The protagonist becomes fixated by the narrative, and I was fascinated by the way that her twin drives towards ethical reporting and reckless transgression clash in this segment. But I'd have liked her to go further into her personal fixations here. The compelling persona is Brittney herself, who comes alive partially because of Catt's identification with her – another bright, bullied girl spiraling out of control in a troubled, forgotten town. Kraus notes that Catt converses with Brittney in detention, but she doesn't dramatise these conversations. This entire part feels curiously unresolved, to the point that Kraus's narration ends almost mid-par